Presentation Instructions

In-Person Oral Presentations

  • Allocated time: 8 minutes talk + 3 minutes Q&A for each paper.
  • You can use any full-screen application you like. Keynote and Powerpoint are good choices. If using Google Slides, make sure you have an offline backup in case of WiFi issues.  For best results make sure your presentation fills a 16:9 screen (aka “widescreen” in most presentation applications).
  • Additional details: NZ uses Type I (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS/NZS_3112) plugs with 230 V @ 50 Hz.  Bring an appropriate adapter and verify that your laptop accepts that power.
  • Dirty Laundry: Every talk (and poster) should include an explicit description of “Dirty Laundry” == some admission of strong assumptions (eg, we assume zero friction), failure modes, and/or other limitations in the results. This was a requirement in the submissions so should not be forgotten in the presentations. *Every* paper has limitations, so this is not negative; it’s a friendly invitation to viewers for Q&A and further research delivered in a fun, engaging spirit.

In-Person Poster Presentations

  • Allocated time: 1 minute spotlight presentation per paper + 40 minutes poster discussion
  • We will use TVs instead of printed posters.
  • Make use of the TV; this is not a printed poster. Use animations and movies. Show your work in action!
  • You can use any full-screen application you like. Keynote and Powerpoint are good choices. If using Google Slides, make sure you have an offline backup in case of WiFi issues.  For best results make sure your presentation fills a 16:9 screen (aka “widescreen” in most presentation applications).
  • We recommend having a prominent “poster slide” with a traditional printed-poster layout: title and authors on top, motivation, problem statement, method overview, (animated) figures, and main results on one screen.
  • Feel free to have additional slides that show details, full-screen movies, and more results.  Jump to these slides as conversations progress.
  • Make sure your paper’s title and author list are at the top of the screen at all times, especially if using multiple slides. Passers-by should be able to know which paper it is, regardless of where you are in a discussion.
  • Additional details: NZ uses Type I (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS/NZS_3112) plugs with 230 V @ 50 Hz.  Bring an appropriate adapter and verify that your laptop accepts that power.
  • Dirty Laundry: Every talk (and poster) should include an explicit description of “Dirty Laundry” == some admission of strong assumptions (eg, we assume zero friction), failure modes, and/or other limitations in the results. This was a requirement in the submissions so should not be forgotten in the presentations. *Every* paper has limitations, so this is not negative; it’s a friendly invitation to viewers for Q&A and further research delivered in a fun, engaging spirit.

Online Poster Presentations

  • Check that your choice of online poster session (1 or 2) is shown correctly on the website. If not, contact pc@corl2022.org ASAP.
  • Allocated time: 30 minutes poster discussion
  • You will have to join the Pheedloop Zoom meeting of your paper and share your screen to present your electronic poster content online.
    • 15 minutes before your online poster session starts, log in PheedLoop and go to the session tab on the left menu bar and find your poster
    • Enter the meeting room and share your screen with your poster content
    • If anything is not working, contact George Kontoudis (kont@umd.edu)
  • We recommend having a prominent “poster slide” with a traditional printed-poster layout: title and authors on top, motivation, problem statement, method overview, (animated) figures, and main results on one screen.
  • Feel free to have additional slides that show details, full-screen movies, and more results.  Jump to these slides as conversations progress.
  • Dirty Laundry: Every talk (and poster) should include an explicit description of “Dirty Laundry” == some admission of strong assumptions (eg, we assume zero friction), failure modes, and/or other limitations in the results. This was a requirement in the submissions so should not be forgotten in the presentations. *Every* paper has limitations, so this is not negative; it’s a friendly invitation to viewers for Q&A and further research delivered in a fun, engaging spirit.